User Tools

Site Tools


documentation:next_cdm:multi_level_linkage

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
documentation:next_cdm:multi_level_linkage [2017/03/01 17:03] – clairblacketerdocumentation:next_cdm:multi_level_linkage [2017/03/01 17:06] (current) – clairblacketer
Line 5: Line 5:
 **Proposal** **Proposal**
  
-Add a table similar to the DRUG_STRENGTH table that would contain information about foods such as calories, fat, and sugar content. The specific use case I am thinking of is related to the [[http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm|NHANES]] dataset; a U.S. based survey that combines both health and nutrition information. I cannot currently store the nutrition information effectively because it would require two levels of association in any of the event tables. For example:+Add an optional table similar to the DRUG_STRENGTH table that would contain information about foods such as calories, fat, and sugar content. The specific use case I am thinking of is related to the [[http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes.htm|NHANES]] dataset; a U.S. based survey that combines both health and nutrition information. I cannot currently store the nutrition information effectively because it would require two levels of association in any of the event tables. For example:
  
          Patient_id -> Date of Meal -> Food item consumed -> Calories in Food item          Patient_id -> Date of Meal -> Food item consumed -> Calories in Food item
Line 12: Line 12:
 This {{:documentation:next_cdm:nhanes_dr1iff_g_example.xlsx|file}} was taken straight from the NHANES website and shows how the dietary data are constructed. Using the current CDM and assuming they would be routed to the OBSERVATION table 'Respondent sequence number' is PERSON_ID and then 'USDA food code' is mapped to OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_ID (This also assumes that the food codes would be added to the vocabulary. If not, the food code would go in OBSERVATION_SOURCE_VALUE and OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_ID would be mapped to 0). The problem with this is then I would only be able to see what foods a person ate on a day but I would not know anything about those foods (grams, calories, protein, etc.).  This {{:documentation:next_cdm:nhanes_dr1iff_g_example.xlsx|file}} was taken straight from the NHANES website and shows how the dietary data are constructed. Using the current CDM and assuming they would be routed to the OBSERVATION table 'Respondent sequence number' is PERSON_ID and then 'USDA food code' is mapped to OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_ID (This also assumes that the food codes would be added to the vocabulary. If not, the food code would go in OBSERVATION_SOURCE_VALUE and OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_ID would be mapped to 0). The problem with this is then I would only be able to see what foods a person ate on a day but I would not know anything about those foods (grams, calories, protein, etc.). 
  
-My proposal is that we create a reference table similar to the DRUG_STRENGTH table to house this information. This would also require the addition of USDA food codes to the vocabulary, as well the addition of food attributes to the vocabulary. +My proposal is that we create an optional reference table similar to the DRUG_STRENGTH table to house this information. This would also require the addition of USDA food codes to the vocabulary, as well the addition of food attributes to the vocabulary. 
  
 ^Field^Required^Type^Description^ ^Field^Required^Type^Description^
documentation/next_cdm/multi_level_linkage.1488387793.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki