Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- documentation:vocabulary:dmd [2016/06/30 16:45] – dimshitc1
+++ documentation:vocabulary:dmd [2016/07/14 12:23] (current) – dimshitc1
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 RxNorm and RxNorm extended concept then have all usual relationships and drug_strenght tables (between Ingredient and Drug, Brand Name and Branded Drug and other)
-**1. Ingredients**
+**1. Ingredients**\\
  all Ingredients and VTMs Maps to RxNorm or RxNorm Extension Ingredients
 if there is VTM containing several ingredients, we map them to each ingredient
@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 --can give an example only after script run
-**2. Concept Classes**
+**2. Concept Classes**\\
 Original dm+d classes (VTM, AMP, AMPP, etc.) are placed in column source_concept_class_id.
 Concept_class_id is standardized and defined by the rules described here:
 http://www.ohdsi.org/web/wiki/doku.php?id=documentation:vocabulary:drug
-**3. Brand Names**
+**3. Brand Names**\\
-Dm+d doesn't provide Brand Name as a separate concept, so we parsed drug descriptions in order to get Brand names
+Dm+d doesn't provide Brand Name as a separate concept, so we parsed drug descriptions in order to get Brand names.
 We use here not a clear Brand Name but any Name differs from Dose Form and Ingredient but used as a part of Drug name by Supplier, for example
 relationship_id = 'RxNorm has ing'
@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 -- add example of RxNorm extension Brand Name concept when it'll be done
-**4. Drug Packs:**
+**4. Drug Packs:**\\
 built Drug Packs with RxNorm like relationships
-**5. Devices**
+**5. Devices**\\
 Dm+d vocabulary contains devices such as bandages, syringes, food supplements, etc.
 Please see http://www.ohdsi.org/web/wiki/doku.php?id=documentation:vocabulary:domains for Domain rules definition.
 Devices don't have RxNorm Extension equivalents and relationships, they present in OMOP vocabulary as standard concepts
-**6. Supplier**
+**6. Supplier**\\
 Supplier info added, made relationships between Marketed Drug Product and Supplier: relationships 'Has supplier' и 'Supplier of' as discribed
 and between Marketed Drug Product and related Drug-concept relationship_id in ('Has marketed form', 'Marketed form of')
-**7. Drug_strength issues**
+**7. Drug_strength issues**\\
 Most part of the drugs are parsed into ds_stage and then into drug_strenght tables but some of them can't be, some examples of these unparsable drugs
 No dosage given:
@@ Line 70: / Line 69: @@
 so this 8.09g is totally useless in purpose of drug_strenght building
+**8. Percents recalculation**
+mostly is obvious, but  \\
+sometimes they don't give exact quantitative factor info so define it by the Drug form, for example
+"Avoca 95% silver nitrate applicators (Bray Group Ltd) 100 applicator 10 x 10 applicators"
+and this is "95% w/w (weight / weight) silver nitrate pencil " , in other words 0,95 mg / mg.