User Tools

Site Tools


documentation:oncology:meeting_notes_2019_jul-30

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
documentation:oncology:meeting_notes_2019_jul-30 [2019/08/07 12:56]
mgurley
documentation:oncology:meeting_notes_2019_jul-30 [2019/08/07 12:59]
mgurley
Line 8: Line 8:
           * https://​forums.ohdsi.org/​t/​how-to-represent-ranges-in-the-measurement-table/​7504           * https://​forums.ohdsi.org/​t/​how-to-represent-ranges-in-the-measurement-table/​7504
           * https://​forums.ohdsi.org/​t/​how-to-implement-a-lab-test-range-result-in-measurement-table/​5221           * https://​forums.ohdsi.org/​t/​how-to-implement-a-lab-test-range-result-in-measurement-table/​5221
-          * The group agreed to test out Rimma'​s recommendation for representing numeric ranges as two entries within the MEASUREMENT table. Michael raised the issue that this will require ​manual curation by the OMOP vocabulary team that might not be scalable in the future to make the necessary entries within the new CONCEPT_NUMERIC table. ​ Michael also raised data quality concerns about creating ​duplicate non-connected entries within the MEASUREMENT table. ​ The group agreed to asses Rimma'​s recommendation after ETL testing.+          * The group agreed to test out Rimma'​s recommendation for representing numeric ranges as two entries within the MEASUREMENT table. Michael raised the issue that this will require manual curation by the OMOP vocabulary team that might not be scalable in the future ​-- to make the necessary entries within the new CONCEPT_NUMERIC table. ​ Michael also raised data quality concerns about creating duplicate non-connected entries within the MEASUREMENT table. ​ The group agreed to reassess ​Rimma'​s recommendation after ETL testing.
documentation/oncology/meeting_notes_2019_jul-30.txt ยท Last modified: 2019/08/07 13:00 by mgurley