projects:workgroups:minutes
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
projects:workgroups:minutes [2015/10/09 16:10] anu_gururaj |
projects:workgroups:minutes [2015/10/22 19:13] anu_gururaj |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| - Presentation by Dr. Noemie Elhadad | - Presentation by Dr. Noemie Elhadad | ||
| - Title: NLP schemas and clinical NLP tools in ShARe, {{:projects:workgroups:15ohdsi_nlp_share.pdf|File}} | - Title: NLP schemas and clinical NLP tools in ShARe, {{:projects:workgroups:15ohdsi_nlp_share.pdf|File}} | ||
| + | - output of converted unstructured text could be in the form of structured data, bag of words and word embedding. Structured data and bag of words are the most useful in the current context. | ||
| + | - the ShARe schema for structured output combines many initiatives such as SHARP, THYME etc. | ||
| - Discussion – Next steps | - Discussion – Next steps | ||
| + | - Table structure for storing concept level NLP outputs to be determined | ||
| + | - It is sufficient to start with structured output | ||
| + | - A concept table with concept ID in each row and note IDs should be generated | ||
| + | - OMOP vocabulary is to be used to aggregate concept to a higher level to manage and condense the number of concepts | ||
| + | - Next step is to go through all the columns exhaustively for all attributes, merge them and then decide the attributes that should be used in the table | ||
| -NLP tools/pipelines for ETL | -NLP tools/pipelines for ETL | ||
| -Use cases, e.g, phenotyping for cohort selection using NLP outputs | -Use cases, e.g, phenotyping for cohort selection using NLP outputs | ||
projects/workgroups/minutes.txt · Last modified: 2015/10/29 18:36 by anu_gururaj
Page Tools
