projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_04132016
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_04132016 [2016/05/11 09:44] anu_gururaj1 created |
projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_04132016 [2016/05/11 10:00] (current) anu_gururaj1 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ==== Agenda ==== | ==== Agenda ==== | ||
| - | {{:projects:workgroups:nlp_wg_meeting_03092016.pdf|}} | + | {{:projects:workgroups:nlp_wg_meeting_04132016.pdf|}} |
| - Discussion of NLP_TERM_TABLE – Hua/Noemie | - Discussion of NLP_TERM_TABLE – Hua/Noemie | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| - Share strategies for combining data from different searches – Jon | - Share strategies for combining data from different searches – Jon | ||
| - Improvements to search engine set up using MT samples – Min | - Improvements to search engine set up using MT samples – Min | ||
| + | - Wrappers for cTAKES and Metamap – Min | ||
| ===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
| - | - Note-type mapping Presentation – Karthik {{:projects:workgroups:ohdsi-nlp-wg1457551276.mp4|}} | + | - NLP term table presentation – Noemie {{:projects:workgroups:nlp_wg_meeting_04132016.pdf|}} |
| - | - INYP terminology services provides clinical document browser based on LOINC ontology for clinical notes. The paper describing the system is published and the pdf is attached. {{:projects:workgroups:loinc_note_mapping_paper.pdf|}} | + | - The note type concept ID is not very useful and should be replaced with a more standardized terminology such as LOINC ontology |
| - | - the system allows for comparison of configs across different sites. | + | - Replace the current single element with 5 elements (pls see presentation for details) |
| - | - Vojtech also has looked into using LOINC ontology for note types. {{:projects:workgroups:loinc_note_types_marshall_clinic.pdf|}} | + | - Extend the note source value field to 255 varchar |
| - | - With reference to standard note types, one of the suggestions was to use it in the database for the output of the NLP system. | + | - In terms of the type of service, LOINC ontology is very complicated, A flat architecture would be better for the current purpose. Comparison with another institution should be carried out. |
| - | - The note table in the OMOP CDM has a note type field with about 10 or so note types | + | - Date is to be added to the table - |
| - | - | + | - Include all NLP concepts into one table called Note_NLP/Term_mention Table. This is an intermediate table that can then be linked to other tables in the CDM such as concept |
| - Next steps: | - Next steps: | ||
| - | - Comparison of what aspects of LOINC is being used across different institutions. | + | - Schedule another meeting in the following week to continue the discussion |
| - | - One of the deliverable is to build a system that can map the institutional note type to the LOINC note types. | + | |
| - | - Update the note type field of the note table in OMOP CDM. Should a subset of LOINC document types be used for this purpose? this would depend on the real-world data from various institutions. | + | |
| - | - Ontologies such as CP, ICD-9 etc. that include more clinical terminologies should also be explored. | + | |
| - | - existing ontologies from Vanderbilt - Hua - {{:projects:workgroups:document-types.zip|}} | + | |
| ===Action Items=== | ===Action Items=== | ||
| - | - Suggestion for OMOP model regarding NLP output - Hua/Noemie | + | - Meeting next week to continue discussion |
| - | - 2016 OHDSI symposium - plan is to present the search engine, medical record viewer (a chart review tool) from Scott; any other suggestions? | + | |
| - Share strategies for combining data from different searches - Jon | - Share strategies for combining data from different searches - Jon | ||
| - Wrappers for cTAKES and Metamap - Min | - Wrappers for cTAKES and Metamap - Min | ||
projects/workgroups/wg_meeting_04132016.1462959852.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/05/11 09:44 by anu_gururaj1
Page Tools
