User Tools

Site Tools


projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_01062016

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_01062016 [2016/01/06 17:01] – created anu_gururajprojects:workgroups:wg_meeting_01062016 [2016/03/07 22:48] (current) – anu_gururaj
Line 3: Line 3:
 ==== Attendees ==== ==== Attendees ====
  
 +Hua Xu, Jon Duke, George Hripcsak, Karthik Natarajan, Anupama Gururaj, Mark Khayter, Min Jiang, Don Torok, Alexandre Yahi, Andrew Williams
  
 ==== Agenda ==== ==== Agenda ====
Line 15: Line 15:
 ===Minutes=== ===Minutes===
  
-  - Presentation +  - General IRB document for use of clinical text and approval from all contributors, post online - Almost completed 
-  - IRB for use of clinical text +  - Collect minimum set of modifiers for all clinical entities that support use of rule to derive clinical concepts: Alex 
-  - Clinical text data storage and representation schema +      * cTAKES is being run on clinical notes programmatically. Alex will present the minimal model in the next meeting. 
-  - NLP tools/pipelines for ETL +  - Aggregate and share note-type metadata from various sources: Karthik 
-  - Use cases, e.g, phenotyping for cohort selection using NLP outputs +      * LOINC note type mapping would be a very useful resource. We should generate hierarchical representation of note-types as an ontology. Karthik will present his work to date at the next meeting. 
-  - Discussion+      * Existing ontology for note types to be shared : Vanderbilt (Hua) and Regenstrief (Jon) 
 +  - Simple search set up for MT samples: MinPresentation 
 +      * Presentation {{:projects:workgroups:clinical_text_search_engine_01_06.pdf|}} 
 +      * The interface being developed should present a summary with visualization for patients/notes. 
 +      * We will add Boolean query options to improve the search 
 +      * We will implement a Ranking algorithm 
 +      * Assign fake patient ID's to the notes to generate the visualization portion. 
 +      * Generate a program like Circe to define the patient cohort 
 +      * Next steps: How to move the data from textual searches stored in a table outside of OMOP to the OMOP? 
 +          * Structured searches from CDW and textual searches can be combined using existing strategies. Jon will share the slides of his presentation on combining data from different searches 
 +          * Run NLP on the ElasticSearch to extract information 
 +  - Wrappers for cTAKES and Metamap  
 +  - Report on the WG - Hua will generate and share with the members for comments 
 +  - The best ways to represent textual data need to be determined 
 + 
 +===Action Items=== 
 + 
 +  - Minimal Model Presentation - Alex 
 +  - Note-type mapping Presentation - Karthink 
 +  - Share existing ontologies from Vanderbilt (Hua) and Regenstrief (Jon) 
 +  - Share strategies for combining data from different searches - Jon 
 +  - Report on WG for commenting - Hua 
 +  - Wrappers for cTAKES and Metamap - Min 
 +  - Improvements to search engine set up using MT samples - Min 
 +  - Textual Data Representation - Discussion
projects/workgroups/wg_meeting_01062016.1452099706.txt.gz · Last modified: by anu_gururaj

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki