Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_03092016 [2016/04/13 16:45] – anu_gururaj1
+++ projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_03092016 [2016/04/13 16:51] (current) – anu_gururaj1
@@ Line 31: / Line 31: @@
           - Comparison of what aspects of LOINC is being used across different institutions.
           - One of the deliverable is to build a system that can map the institutional note type to the LOINC note types.
-          - Update the note type field of the note table in OMOP CDM. Should a subset of LOINC document types be used for this purpose? this would depend on the real-world data
+          - Update the note type field of the note table in OMOP CDM. Should a subset of LOINC document types be used for this purpose? this would depend on the real-world data from various institutions.
+          - Ontologies such as CP, ICD-9 etc. that include more clinical terminologies should also be explored.
    - existing ontologies from Vanderbilt - Hua - {{:projects:workgroups:document-types.zip|}}
@@ Line 37: / Line 38: @@
   - Suggestion for OMOP model regarding NLP output - Hua/Noemie
-  - Share existing ontologies from Regenstrief (Jon)
+  - 2016 OHDSI symposium - plan is to present the search engine, medical record viewer (a chart review tool) from Scott; any other suggestions?
   - Share strategies for combining data from different searches - Jon
-  - Report on WG for commenting - Hua
   - Wrappers for cTAKES and Metamap - Min
   - Improvements to search engine set up using MT samples - Min
   - Textual Data Representation - Discussion
   - NLP system evaluation across different sites - Discussion