User Tools

Site Tools


projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_02032016

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_02032016 [2016/03/07 21:53]
anu_gururaj
projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_02032016 [2016/03/09 20:31] (current)
anu_gururaj
Line 3: Line 3:
 ==== Attendees ==== ==== Attendees ====
  
-Hua Xu, Jon Duke, George Hripcsak, Karthik Natarajan, Anupama Gururaj, Mark Khayter, Min Jiang, Alexandre Yahi, Noemie Elhadad, Juan M Banda, Olga Patterson, Lian+Hua Xu, Jon Duke, George Hripcsak, Karthik Natarajan, Anupama Gururaj, Mark Khayter, Min Jiang, Alexandre Yahi, Noemie Elhadad, Juan M Banda, Olga Patterson, Lian Hu
  
 ==== Agenda ==== ==== Agenda ====
 +
 +{{:​projects:​workgroups:​nlp_wg_meeting_02032016_final.pdf|}}
  
   - Minimal Model Presentation – Alex   - Minimal Model Presentation – Alex
Line 20: Line 22:
 ===Minutes=== ===Minutes===
  
-  - Minimal model presentation - Alex+  - Minimal model presentation - Alex {{:​projects:​workgroups:​ohdsi_nlp_wg_yahi.pdf|}}
         - the model is based on the SHARE-N model and adapted to the current data structure. This model incorporates other semantic types and all of the modifiers are not available in cTAKES yet.         - the model is based on the SHARE-N model and adapted to the current data structure. This model incorporates other semantic types and all of the modifiers are not available in cTAKES yet.
         - the notes were processed from eMERGE cohort at Columbia with about 60,000 notes encompassing 1700 patients. The original patient number was 3200.         - the notes were processed from eMERGE cohort at Columbia with about 60,000 notes encompassing 1700 patients. The original patient number was 3200.
Line 33: Line 35:
           - Alex's script is to be tried on different datasets and evaluated across notes from different institutions           - Alex's script is to be tried on different datasets and evaluated across notes from different institutions
           - Identify minimal set of notes to work with when recommending to the OHDSI community           - Identify minimal set of notes to work with when recommending to the OHDSI community
- +          ​Identify sets of concepts that are not reliable ​negation is a very good example ​of this idea
-  ​Aggregate and share note-type metadata from various sources: Karthik +          Continue discussion ​of NLP system evaluation across ​different ​sites 
-      * LOINC note type mapping would be a very useful resource. We should generate hierarchical representation ​of note-types as an ontology. Karthink will present his work to date at the next meeting+   - The NLP-WG will meet on second Wednesday of every month
-      * Existing ontology for note types to be shared : Vanderbilt (Hua) and Regenstrief (Jon) +
-  ​Simple search set up for MT samples: MinPresentation +
-      * Presentation +
-      * The interface being developed should present a summary with visualization for patients/​notes. +
-      * We will add Boolean query options to improve the search +
-      * We will implement a Ranking algorithm +
-      * Assign fake patient ID's to the notes to generate the visualization portion. +
-      * Generate a program like Circe to define the patient cohort +
-      * Next steps: How to move the data from textual searches stored in a table outside ​of OMOP to the OMOP? +
-          * Structured searches from CDW and textual searches can be combined using existing strategies. Jon will share the slides of his presentation on combining data from different ​searches +
-          * Run NLP on the ElasticSearch to extract information +
-  ​Wrappers for cTAKES and Metamap  +
-  - Report on the WG - Hua will generate and share with the members for comments +
-  - The best ways to represent textual data need to be determined+
  
 ===Action Items=== ===Action Items===
  
-  ​- Minimal Model Presentation - Alex +  - Note-type mapping Presentation - Karthik
-  ​- Note-type mapping Presentation - Karthink+
   - Share existing ontologies from Vanderbilt (Hua) and Regenstrief (Jon)   - Share existing ontologies from Vanderbilt (Hua) and Regenstrief (Jon)
   - Share strategies for combining data from different searches - Jon   - Share strategies for combining data from different searches - Jon
Line 61: Line 48:
   - Improvements to search engine set up using MT samples - Min   - Improvements to search engine set up using MT samples - Min
   - Textual Data Representation - Discussion   - Textual Data Representation - Discussion
 +  - NLP system evaluation across different sites - Discussion
projects/workgroups/wg_meeting_02032016.1457387628.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/03/07 21:53 by anu_gururaj