projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_04132016
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Last revision Both sides next revision | |||
|
projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_04132016 [2016/05/11 09:44] anu_gururaj1 created |
projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_04132016 [2016/05/11 09:55] anu_gururaj1 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ==== Agenda ==== | ==== Agenda ==== | ||
| - | {{:projects:workgroups:nlp_wg_meeting_03092016.pdf|}} | + | {{:projects:workgroups:nlp_wg_meeting_04132016.pdf|}} |
| - Discussion of NLP_TERM_TABLE – Hua/Noemie | - Discussion of NLP_TERM_TABLE – Hua/Noemie | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| - Share strategies for combining data from different searches – Jon | - Share strategies for combining data from different searches – Jon | ||
| - Improvements to search engine set up using MT samples – Min | - Improvements to search engine set up using MT samples – Min | ||
| + | - Wrappers for cTAKES and Metamap – Min | ||
| ===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
| - | - Note-type mapping Presentation – Karthik {{:projects:workgroups:ohdsi-nlp-wg1457551276.mp4|}} | + | - NLP term table presentation – Noemie {{:projects:workgroups:nlp_wg_meeting_04132016.pdf|}} |
| - | - INYP terminology services provides clinical document browser based on LOINC ontology for clinical notes. The paper describing the system is published and the pdf is attached. {{:projects:workgroups:loinc_note_mapping_paper.pdf|}} | + | - The note type concept ID is not very useful and should be replaced with a more standardized terminology such as LOINC ontology |
| - | - the system allows for comparison of configs across different sites. | + | - Replace the current single element with 5 elements (pls see presentation for details) |
| - | - Vojtech also has looked into using LOINC ontology for note types. {{:projects:workgroups:loinc_note_types_marshall_clinic.pdf|}} | + | - Extend the note source value field to 255 varchar |
| - | - With reference to standard note types, one of the suggestions was to use it in the database for the output of the NLP system. | + | - In terms of the type of service, LOINC ontology is very complicated, A flat architecture would be better for the current purpose. Comparison with another institution should be carried out. |
| - The note table in the OMOP CDM has a note type field with about 10 or so note types | - The note table in the OMOP CDM has a note type field with about 10 or so note types | ||
| - | - | ||
projects/workgroups/wg_meeting_04132016.txt · Last modified: 2016/05/11 10:00 by anu_gururaj1
Page Tools
