projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_04132016
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_04132016 [2016/05/11 09:55] anu_gururaj1 |
projects:workgroups:wg_meeting_04132016 [2016/05/11 10:00] (current) anu_gururaj1 |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| - Extend the note source value field to 255 varchar | - Extend the note source value field to 255 varchar | ||
| - In terms of the type of service, LOINC ontology is very complicated, A flat architecture would be better for the current purpose. Comparison with another institution should be carried out. | - In terms of the type of service, LOINC ontology is very complicated, A flat architecture would be better for the current purpose. Comparison with another institution should be carried out. | ||
| - | - The note table in the OMOP CDM has a note type field with about 10 or so note types | + | - Date is to be added to the table - |
| - | - | + | - Include all NLP concepts into one table called Note_NLP/Term_mention Table. This is an intermediate table that can then be linked to other tables in the CDM such as concept |
| - Next steps: | - Next steps: | ||
| - | - Comparison of what aspects of LOINC is being used across different institutions. | + | - Schedule another meeting in the following week to continue the discussion |
| - | - One of the deliverable is to build a system that can map the institutional note type to the LOINC note types. | + | |
| - | - Update the note type field of the note table in OMOP CDM. Should a subset of LOINC document types be used for this purpose? this would depend on the real-world data from various institutions. | + | |
| - | - Ontologies such as CP, ICD-9 etc. that include more clinical terminologies should also be explored. | + | |
| - | - existing ontologies from Vanderbilt - Hua - {{:projects:workgroups:document-types.zip|}} | + | |
| ===Action Items=== | ===Action Items=== | ||
| - | - Suggestion for OMOP model regarding NLP output - Hua/Noemie | + | - Meeting next week to continue discussion |
| - | - 2016 OHDSI symposium - plan is to present the search engine, medical record viewer (a chart review tool) from Scott; any other suggestions? | + | |
| - Share strategies for combining data from different searches - Jon | - Share strategies for combining data from different searches - Jon | ||
| - Wrappers for cTAKES and Metamap - Min | - Wrappers for cTAKES and Metamap - Min | ||
projects/workgroups/wg_meeting_04132016.1462960527.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/05/11 09:55 by anu_gururaj1
Page Tools
