Warning: session_write_close(): write failed: No space left on device (28) in /var/www/html/web/wiki/doku.php on line 117

Warning: session_write_close(): Failed to write session data (files). Please verify that the current setting of session.save_path is correct () in /var/www/html/web/wiki/doku.php on line 117

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/web/wiki/doku.php:117) in /var/www/html/web/wiki/inc/actions.php on line 38

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/html/web/wiki/doku.php:117) in /var/www/html/web/wiki/lib/tpl/dokuwiki/main.php on line 12
research:largescalepopest [Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics]

User Tools

Site Tools


research:largescalepopest

Large-Scale Population-Level Evidence Generation

Objective: - Generate evidence for the comparative effectiveness for each pairwise comparison of depression treatments for a set of outcomes of interest..

Rationale: In current practice, most comparative effectiveness questions are answered individually in a study per question. This is problematic because the slow pace at which evidence is generated, but also invites reporting and publishing only those studies where the result is ‘statistically significant’, leading to an underestimation of the true number of tests performed when correcting for multiple testing. This process is known as publication bias. Moreover, these studies typically do not include the evidence needed to interpret the study results, such as empirical estimates of residual bias inherent to the study design and data used. A solution to these problems is to perform a large set of comparative effectiveness analyses in one study, where each analysis adheres to current best practices. One of these best practices that we’ll follow is to use large scale propensity models to adjust for confounding. Another best practice that this study will follow is that each analysis will include a large set of negative and positive control outcomes (outcomes that are respectively not known or known to be cause by one exposure more than the other). In this study we would like to demonstrate the feasibility of generating population-level estimates at scale by focusing on on disease: depression. We perform every possible pairwise comparison between depression treatments for a large set of outcomes of interest. Most of these outcomes are generic safety outcomes, but some outcomes are related more specifically to the effectiveness of antidepressant treatment.

Project Lead(s): Martijn Schuemie, Patrick Ryan

Coordinating Institution(s): Janssen R&D

Additional Participants (currently seeking additional collaborators):

  • Marc Suchard
  • Peter Rijnbeek

Any interested collaborators please contact Martijn Schuemie at schuemie@ohdsi.org and I will be happy to add you to the collaborator list.

Participating Institution(s): Janssen R&D

Full Protocol: Large-Scale Population-Level Evidence Generation Protocol

Initial Proposal Date: 1/8/2016

Launch Date: 9/121/2016

Receive Results for Analysis Date: TBD

Study Closure Date: TBD

Results Submission: Via the OHDSI Sharing module embedded in study.

Requirements

CDM: V5 only

Table Accessed: CONCEPT, CONCEPT_ANCESTOR, CONDITION_ERA, CONDITION_OCCURRENCE, DRUG_ERA, DRUG_EXPOSURE, MEASUREMENT, OBSERVATION, OBSERVATION_PERIOD, PERSON, PROCEDURE_OCCURRENCE, VISIT_OCCURRENCE

Database Dialects: SQL Server, Postgres, Oracle, RedShift, PDW

Software: R (>= 3.2.2, RTools), Java

Hardware: Recommended 8 cores, 64GB memory, 250GB free space

How to Run: Full installation and run instructions are provided on the GitHub page below.

Code

Datasets Run

  • CCAE (Janssen)
  • MDCD (Janssen)
  • MDCR (Janssen)
  • Optum (Janssen)
research/largescalepopest.txt · Last modified: 2016/09/22 15:11 by schuemie